Archive for the ‘President’ Category

This article is quite interesting and very lengthy. For the full article please visit:
WorldReports.org

LONG-RANGE SUBVERSION STRATEGY THWARTED BY INTERNATIONAL ACTION
Thursday 7 January 2010

PENDING SMKM/CMKX CASE AGAINST THE S.E.C. WILL BE THE BIGGEST FRAUDULENT FINANCE LAWSUIT IN HISTORY: MASSIVE SCAMMING PLATFORM RUN BY BUSH JR.’S S.E.C.

OPERATION STILLPOINT was finally DEFEATED with the confirmation, application and decisive consequences of the sovereign lenders’ Writ of Execution, followed by imposition of the massive Lien against the US Treasury for $47 trillion which the defrauded parties, the Chinese authorities and the British Monarchical Power, had to execute on or about 6th December 2009.

However, notwithstanding that OPERATION STILLPOINT has been destabilised, degraded, collapsed and is in the process of being dismantled – and the Republic therefore prospectively rescued at the last moment from what was intended by its sworn enemies – certain operatives, including Leon Panetta, Timothy Geithner, Mrs Hillary Clinton, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney and, at the bottom of the pile of snakes, Wanta, have had a problem getting used to the NEW PARADIGM, whereby the subversives engaged in the systematic sabotage of the ongoing US financial restitution operations (in order to ‘rescue’ OPERATION STILLPOINT), have now been placed not only firmly on the defensive, but in a bind from which they cannot extricate themselves (even though their arrogance remains such that they imagine that they can).

OPERATION STILLPOINT, re-invoked in sterile fashion by Wanta in November 2007 to trigger the domino effect, was put together by the traitors George Bush Sr. and Dr Alan Greenspan. When the exposures and the September 2008 ‘lockdown’ stymied the Paulson Treasury, strenuous efforts were made to saddle (intended) President Obama with a team of colleague-snakes who could be relied upon to revive, perpetuate and conclude OPERATION STILLPOINT beyond Stage 2. This team of traitors is now under intense pressure, as indeed are ALL personnel within and beyond the US official structures who have participated in these unending criminal operations, serving the interests of enemy foreign powers, to bring the United States and its people to their knees

CRUCIAL MEASURES TO BACK UP THE $47 TRILLION LIEN ON THE TREASURY
As indicated, patience on the part of the reader is necessary because we first have to address the present situation, which is explosive and historically unprecedented. Specifically:

• INTERPOL’S DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY AND HABEAS CORPUS:
For the purposes of surmounting this crisis, and FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE, contrary to the ignorant knee-jerk chatter on many websites, President Barack Obama promulgated Executive Order 13524 on 16th December 2009, which amended Executive Order 12425 dated 16th June 1983 (amended by the Executive Order 12971 dated 15th September 1995) so as ‘to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities of the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)’.

• The effect of President Obama’s Executive Order of 16th December 2009 is to grant INTERPOL full immunity from search and arrest or seizure of all INTERPOL properties including the agency’s own personnel, thereby providing INTERPOL with de facto diplomatic immunity.

This is a truly historic development, because it means that for the purposes of resolving this crisis HABEAS CORPUS IS SUSPENDED. The last time this happened was under President Lincoln.

The US Government has surrendered its authority to an international organisation charged with investigating corruption inside the US Government’s own structures. The United States has not been sovereign since the Lien Holders had to proceed with executing their Lien on or about 6th December 2009, but will of course resume its sovereign status on satisfaction of the Lien.

With Habeas Corpus suspended for the purposes strictly of procuring compliance with the Writ of Enforcement and the huge Lien against the US Treasury and thus the (legitimate) Settlements, the heavily armed status of INTERPOL and other foreign enforcement personnel that are operating under diplomatic cover to bring this crisis to resolution on behalf of the injured parties, the myriad Ponzi victims of the Syndicate’s schemes, the United States, the American people and the Rest of the World, can be more readily appreciated.

• ALL MONEY SABOTEURS = ECONOMIC TERRORISTS
As revealed in our 28th December report, on the basis of information divulged to us on 26th December 2009, the US Department of Justice within the Executive Branch has implemented a fundamental POLICY CHANGE, having determined in December, against the background of the execution of the Lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury, that:

• ALL individuals and entities within the US jurisdiction that have participated in the stealing, diversion and conversion of funds belonging to others, INCLUDING past and present officials within the US Government and its structures, WILL BE INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED FOR ECONOMIC TERRORISM perpetrated against the United States and the American people (and the Rest of the World). Specifically:

• ANYONE, whether officials in, or formerly in Government, whether CEOs of financial institutions or lower-ranking bankers, partners in ‘involved’ US law firms, all intermediaries and intelligence operatives and others who have been engaged in obstructing the Settlements process by ANY MEANS AND AT ANY TIME IN THE PAST, and who have, by their actions, contributed to the DELAY, are being treated forthwith as ECONOMIC TERRORISTS – by the US justice system itself.

• Perpetrating ECONOMIC TERRORISM will be, and is, to be treated as TREASON by virtue of the fact that it entails DECLARING ECONOMIC WARFARE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS PEOPLE, AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES.

• The penalty for TREASON IN TIME OF WAR is summary execution.

• This decision PRECISELY REFLECTS what we have been proclaiming in this column for the past three years. We are informed that the US Justice Department has at long last understood what we have been saying, and has been galvanised by the horrendous implications for the $47 trillion Lien on the US Treasury and its decisive ramifications, into adopting the foregoing as RIGID OFFICIAL POLICY from which no deviation will be permitted.

• It follows that the US Attorney General and all the State Attorneys General are obliged to act vigorously on the basis of the POLICY CHANGE, or they themselves can and will be arrested for obstruction of justice by INTERPOL personnel and then extradited to a jurisdiction such as the British jurisdiction for defying obligations imposed on them by International Law.

• It should NOT be assumed that this POLICY CHANGE arises because of a change of heart at the US Department of Justice (resulting for instance from reading our reports). On the contrary:

• This POLICY CHANGE is a direct consequence of the situation arising from the implementation of the Lien and the drastic enforcement measures that are being taken inside the United States by the international cadres and ‘men in suits’ referenced in recent reports. President Obama’s Executive Order Amending Executive Order 12425 dated 16th December and publicised by the Office of the Press Secretary, White House, on 17th December 2009 [see above], to ‘extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)’ is associated with this POLICY CHANGE at the US Department of Justice.

• Finally, since this is, as reiterated, an official POLICY CHANGE, its full implementation is NOT dependent upon finalisation of the Settlements. This reality should quickly lodge itself inside the brains of the official and financial sector criminal financiers and thieves, who face investigation and prosecution ANYWAY. Obviously, if they persist with their obstruction, thefts and diversionary operations, they will be increasing their chances of being summarily executed for treason.

• EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN DEFRAUDING THE UNITED STATES IS TO BE TARGETED:
Although this fact is confirmed above, it was REITERATED with further emphasis to this service on 3rd January that EVERYBODY, without exception, who has been involved and remains involved in defrauding the United States and the American people is going to be investigated.
See more at: WorldReports.org

We just posted a Reuters news article in our forum in reference to Barack Obama and the situation in Afghanistan.

Reuters Article

After reading this article, I sat and pondered. I remember watching all of the primary election debates and discussion, and remember how angry I became each time the candidates made their typical empty promises. I don’t want to go off the track here, but this of course does not include Dr. Ron Paul, whom I backed in this last election, and who was marginalized the entire election, and marginalized is being polite. At some points he was made out to look like a kook by Mainstream Media, and the other candidates.

So here we are 1 year later, And Mr. Obama so far, has proven that he is nothing more than a liar.

And to top it all off, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. For what?  What he is going to achieve?

“The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”

In the video below, he makes the following statement:

“I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war….”

Perhaps he is math challenged? 2017 is is 7.2 years away approximately. How many more deaths? How many more injuries? And for what?  I’m once again angered.  At the lies, and I’m sorry to say at the American people. For one reason only, for voting  a man into office who’s only talent is that he is articulate and smooth when speaking. Other than this, I’m sorry, he has shown me nothing other than his willingness to:

Nationalize the banking industry, the auto industry, soon the health care industry, perhaps Private Pensions as well?

Once again, America voted for change? Well I smell it coming. The Socialist States of America.

WorldNetDaily

Is Speaker Nancy Pelosi guilty of helping to fraudulently conceal Barack Obama’s ineligibility to be president? That may be the case, based on an exposé by JB Williams with the Canada Free Press.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583

A commentator at Canada Free Press says he has obtained copies of two documents apparently prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.

Writer JB Williams describes himself as a “no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy.” And he say’s he’s gotten possession of copies of the documents in question.

The first includes a verification that Obama and Joe Biden, then-candidate for vice president, “are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, although the signatures are different, including the same strategic typographical error. But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone.

“The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one,” he wrote. “One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.

“The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of president is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama president,” he wrote.

WND contacted the Democratic Nation Committee multiple times over three days to request an explanation of the two images, including whether one might be a forgery. A spokeswoman in the press office confirmed, “We are aware of it,” but declined to elaborate.

Likewise, WND contacted the office of Pelosi, but got no response over several days. And the White House declined to respond to multiple e-mails asking for a comment.

Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president’s birth certificate documentation here.

“The fact that TWO DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and notarized by the same individuals on the same day, means that a very real conspiracy to commit election fraud was under way, and since it took until six months after the election to uncover it, the conspiracy was indeed successful,” Williams wrote.

“Are you still wondering why Barack Obama has spent nearly $1.5 million in taxpayer’s funds to race Department of Justice lawyers around the country to stop all cases questioning Obama’s eligibility before discovery can force Obama to open up his top secret life?”

He described the discoveries as “actually very serious business.”

“We are talking about the top-down leadership of the ruling political party knowingly and wantonly defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election documents.”

The documents show the “Official Certification of Nomination” of Obama, of “5046 South Greenwood Avenue” in Chicago and Joe Biden, of “1209 Barley Mill Road” in Wilmington, Del., as the party’s candidates.

They were signed by Pelosi as chair of the Democratic National Convention as well as Alice Travis Germond, the secretary of the Democratic National Convention at its nominating meetings in Denver a year ago.

They were notarized by Shalifa A. Williamson of Denver.

Other bloggers also speculated that a document was signed with the verification of constitutional eligibility, and Democratic officials then decided to generate another without, suggesting at least an awareness of the issue involved.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Some of the lawsuits over the dispute question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama’s American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama’s citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama’s decision to spend sums estimated over $1 million to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery.

WND reported this week on a decision by a California judge to schedule a trial early next year on the arguments over Obama’s eligibility.

U.S. District Judge David Carter tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for the case. If the case actually goes to arguments, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

Arguments over other online Obama images also have raged. His campaign and now his administration repeatedly has pointed to an online image of a “Certification of Live Birth” from Hawaii has documenting his status, even though such documents are not, in fact, proof. Critics have suggested the image itself is fraudulent.

And in just recent days, WND reported Lucas Smith, the man who tried to sell an alleged Barack Obama Kenyan birth certificate on eBay, filed court papers insisting – under threat of perjury – that the Obama birth certificate in his possession is the genuine article.

California attorney Orly Taitz, who is working on the California challenge now scheduled for trial, posted on her blog Smith’s declaration, which claims he obtained the alleged birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, and insists it’s real.

“The true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A,” the declaration reads. “I declare, certify, verify, state and affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements of fact and descriptions of circumstances and events are true and correct.”

Smith’s affidavit, which includes a copy of the certificate, has been filed with Carter, whose works in the Central District of California.

In his filing, Smith declares that he traveled to Kenya in February and paid off a military officer in order to obtain a copy of the birth certificate from Coast General Hospital in Mombasa. The declaration also states that the hospital administrator signed and sealed the copy, which indicates Obama’s birth in Africa on Aug. 4, 1961, at 7:24 p.m.

However, WND has reported on an authentic 1961-era Kenyan birth certificate, which looks distinctly different from the document Smith released in the video.

Williams explained political parties in the U.S. are responsible for vetting their own candidates.

The nomination form, however, including the certificate of eligibility under the Constitution, wasn’t actually used.

“Instead, a very similar document was delivered to 50 state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of 50 state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these ‘certified’ candidates on the ballot,’” Williams wrote.

“And yes, I have a copy of this version of the DNC Official Certification of Nomination letter too!” he wrote.

“There is no honest debate on the matter anymore. Obama is NOT a constitutional president, which is to say, we do NOT have a constitutional federal administration at present and every anti-American policy of the last six months is also, BINGO! – Unconstitutional!” he wrote.

“What is still in question however – does any court in America have the backbone to do what must be done? – And what do the American people do, if not one court in the nation has that kind of constitutional backbone today?” he continued.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama’s eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: “Where’s the birth certificate?”

The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 450,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.

The “certification of live birth” posted online and widely touted as “Obama’s birth certificate” does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same “short-form” document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true “long-form” birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a “natural born citizen,” no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama’s claim to a Hawaiian birth.